1. Of the land listed in the attached Table 1, the Defendant indicated in the attached Form 60, 59, 11, 12, 64, 63, 62, 61, and 60, respectively, on the part of the Plaintiff.

1. Determination as to the cause of claim

A. In full view of the purport of the pleadings as a result of the survey and appraisal of evidence No. 1-2, evidence No. 1-2, evidence No. 1-5, and evidence No. 1-2, evidence No. 1-2, and evidence No. 5, the land listed in the separate sheet No. 1 (hereinafter “the land of this case”) was completed on May 30, 2008 due to sale by the Plaintiff, and the land listed in the separate sheet No. 2 (hereinafter “the land of this case”) owned by the Plaintiff on October 5, 1989, after the Plaintiff completed the registration of ownership transfer on the land of this case No. 1-2, No. 6-2, and No. 1-2, the land of this case and No. 6-1, No. 6-2, the land of this case, “No. 6-2, and No. 1-6, No. 1, 206-6,” and each of the above land owned by the Defendant on the instant building No. 6-6-1, 6.

B. According to the defendant's duty to remove the building and the fact of recognition on the duty to deliver land, the part of the building "A" and "B" in this case owned by the defendant interfere with the plaintiff's exercise of the plaintiff's ownership by impairing the land of this case 1, 2, and thus, the defendant removes the part of the building "A" and "B" in this case in response to the plaintiff's exercise of the plaintiff's right to claim a real right based on ownership (Article 213 and