A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Of the facts charged in this case, the violation of the Act on Finance Specializing in Credit and the withdrawal of cash.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal record] On November 28, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for fraud, etc. at the Seoul Southern District Court on November 28, 2016 and completed the execution of the sentence at the Seoul Southern Southern District Court on November 15, 2015.

[2] On August 6, 2016, the Defendant: (a) committed a theft with one 14K-ro 14K-based 14K-based 14K-based 14K-based 14K-based 14K-based 14K-based 14K-based 14K-based ctel D located in the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Officetel D on August 6, 2016

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Legal statement of the witness B;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the standard contract for pawned loan transactions;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act, the choice of imprisonment and punishment for the crime;

1. The defendant has a record of criminal punishment for the same kind of crime with the reason for sentencing Article 35 of the Criminal Act for aggravated repeated crimes.

Although the crime of this case was committed for a repeated crime period, it did not compensate for the damage to the victim including the crime of this case.

However, the victim has borne expenses that do not reach the amount of damage and recovered the damage in the decision.

In light of these circumstances, the conditions of sentencing prescribed in Article 51 of the Criminal Act shall be considered and the sentencing criteria shall be determined as per Disposition.

The not guilty portion [the summary of the public prosecutor's office] The indictment contains 18 times in total, but it is about 19 times in total when the thief crimes are added to 18 times in the judgment.

In addition, among the facts charged in the indictment, the "80,00" appears to be a clerical error in the "80,500" in the attached list of crimes (1) net damages (won) 25 is deemed to be a clerical error in the "80,500", and the facts charged in the attached list (2) monthly 17 is deemed to have been remitted not to have withdrawn the amount of damage.

1. On June 15, 2016, the Defendant in violation of the Act on Specialized Credit Financial Business: (a) around 00:16, the Defendant settled the G e-mail card (H) containing the victim’s bank located in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E in the victim’s bank; and (b) put the G e-mail card again into the same by re-putting it again, from that time until July 10, 2016.