1. Defendant A is punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than six months and the remainder of the crimes as indicated in the judgment of the case Nos. 1, 2, and 3.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Justice] On June 27, 2018, Defendant A was sentenced to a suspended sentence of six months of imprisonment for special larceny in the Busan District Court’s Branch Branch of the Dong Branch of the Busan District Court on July 5, 2018, and the decision became final and conclusive on July 5, 2018 and is currently under suspended sentence.

"2018 Highest 4891"

1. The Defendants’ co-principal

A. Special larceny Defendants, who reside in one house, stolen a vehicle that Defendant A borrowed money from his ship and demanded payment from his ship, and sentenced Defendant A to drinking it to Gyeonggi-do away from Busan.

1) On August 14, 2018, at around 22:30, the Defendants jointly reported the network in the front parking lot of the Dadong apartment apartment apartment apartment of the Busan-gun, Busan-gun, Busan-gun, and Defendant B discovered that the tea door of the passenger car owned by the victim E was not locked while the vehicle was parked in the vehicle installed at the parking lot, and the vehicle was opened and opened a door and cut off with one credit card per one thousand won in cash owned by the above victim. (ii) The Defendants reported the network on August 14, 2018 at the front of the Busan-gu, Busan-gun, Busan-gun, and on August 23:0, 2018, the Defendants confirmed that there was no corrected vehicle in front of the vehicle parked at the parking lot, and the Defendant A did not open the vehicle at the time with the door of the vehicle that was parked in the vehicle owned by the victim I and confirmed that the vehicle was not opened by the vehicle at the time.

B. On August 15, 2018, the Defendants in violation of the Fraudulent and Specialized Credit Financial Business Act presented the stolen credit card to the victim as if the Defendants were the credit cards of the Defendants, at K operated by the victim under the name unsound in the Geum-gu, Busan, U.S.J., and concluded that they would purchase tobacco by presenting the stolen credit card to the victim as if the Defendants were the credit cards.

However, the defendants are not the owners or legitimate holders of the above credit card, and even if they purchase tobacco, they will pay the price.