logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원부천지원 2017.10.12 2017가단102091
용역비
Text

1. Defendant C’s KRW 20,000,000 per annum for the Plaintiff and 5% per annum from January 1, 2016 to October 12, 2017.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Defendant medical corporation B (hereinafter “Defendant foundation”) is a medical corporation operating three convalescents in the racing city at Suwon-si and one convalescent City at Suwon-si. Defendant C is the founder of Defendant Foundation and the father of the director of Defendant Foundation E, who actually participated in the operation of Defendant Foundation in the name of the president. The Plaintiff was a person who, around March 2014, completed the highest course of the F University Health Policy Graduate School and became aware of the same course.

B. The Defendant Foundation planned to establish a new convalescent hospital which combines three convalescent hospitals operated by the racing.

C. On April 2015, the Plaintiff entered into a service contract regarding personnel management, education, etc. of a convalescent hospital (hereinafter “instant service contract”) in which Defendant C and Defendant Foundation newly integrated racing, and there was no specific agreement on service costs at the time.

On June 2015, the Defendant Foundation organized a TF Team for the preparation of integrated care hospitals and appointed the Plaintiff as the Vice-Chairperson of the TF Team.

E. From June 2015, the Plaintiff is working as the vice-chairperson of the Defendant Foundation TF Team.

Around August 2015, he/she resigned from office, but was involved in the establishment of a new hospital by giving and receiving data necessary for the establishment of the TF Team of the Defendant Foundation and a new hospital from October 2015.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, entry of Gap evidence 1, 2, and 7 (including virtual numbers), witness G testimony, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination on the cause of the claim

A. 1) The Plaintiff asserted that, as the Plaintiff entered into the instant service contract with the Defendants, the Defendant Foundation is also obligated to pay the service cost.

B. The defendant C is actually involved in the operation of the defendant foundation, and the plaintiff is appointed as the vice-chairperson of the defendant foundation's TF team.

arrow