(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2019.08.13 2019고단1828

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2019.08.13 2019고단1828

도로교통법위반

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 60,000 won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 30,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 21, 2019, the Defendant driven the B car volume on May 21, 2013:35, and led to the progress of the E-distance in front of the Diplomatic Conference in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul.

At the same time, the signal lights are installed in a private distance intersection in operation, and the yellow signal after signal for red stop and left turn turn turn at the front of the direction, so in such a case, all drivers of vehicles have a duty of care to comply with the signal or instruction displayed by the traffic safety facilities.

Nevertheless, the Defendant violated the signal by proceeding the intersection in the yellow signal as it is without receiving a direction signal.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Control note, notice of penalty payment, and field map;

1. On-site photographs (the defendant asserts that he did not go straight to the left and did not violate the signal. However, even according to the defendant's statement in this court, the defendant was straighted in time, such as a yellow signal with the knowledge of the change to the right-hand signal after the left-hand signal, and according to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, it is recognized that the defendant's vehicle passed through the intersection as it goes to the right-hand turn at the right-hand turn at the intersection, and the defendant's argument is not accepted. Accordingly, the defendant's argument is not accepted.).

1. Article 156 (1) 1 of the Road Traffic Act and Articles 156 (1) 1 and 5 (1) of the same Act concerning applicable criminal facts and the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The sentencing conditions indicated in the records, such as the Defendant’s age, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., shall be determined in light of the following: (a) there is no criminal history to punish the Defendant for the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which exceeds the suspended sentence of imprisonment; and (b) the sentencing conditions

참조조문

유사 판례

-수원지방법원 2021.02.04 2020고단6173

-수원지방법원 2018.11.01 2018노1721

-서울중앙지방법원 2018.12.06 2018나36976

-대구지방법원 김천지원 2021.04.05 2020고단1896

-울산지방법원 2019.12.20 2018고단3695