A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 12, 2017, at around 22:19, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by force, such as: (a) entering the “C” restaurant located in Yeonsu-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Incheon; (b) under the influence of alcohol, she takes a bath without any justifiable reason; (c) taking the victim’s failure into the restaurant, and (d) holding the victim out of the restaurant so as to have the Defendant run his/her business, and (d) allowing the victim to open the door and sell the door to the outside, and (e) prohibiting other customers from entering the restaurant business.

2. On December 12, 2017, the Defendant: (a) 22:37, at the same place as “on December 12, 2017, the Defendant: (b) expressed a desire to “on the part of the police officer’s 112-on-site failure”; (c) expressed a defect in the background leading up to the Incheon Yeonsu-gu Incheon Yeonsu-gu Incheon training Police Station E-gu’s demand for presentation of identification cards and for returning home, and obstructed the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties by assaulting and threatening the police officer’s left knee, such as walkinging off one time to the left knee of the said F, thereby interfering with the police officer’s 112 reporting and maintaining order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to D and F;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with the performance of public duties) and the choice of imprisonment for each crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution ( normal consideration considered as follows):

1. On the grounds of sentencing in Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, the first crime (Interference with the performance of official duties) [the scope of recommending punishment] [the scope of punishment] [the mitigated punishment area (one month to eight months] [the scope of recommending punishment] mitigated (one month to eight months], where the degree of violence, intimidation, deceptive scheme, or obstruction of official duties is minor, the second crime (Interference with the performance of official duties) [the scope of recommending punishment] mitigated area (one month to eight months] mitigated (including efforts to recover damage).