logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.10.13 2020가단5090861
건물인도
Text

1. The defendant 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 2 of the attached Form 2. Map No. 2, 4, 6, 2 among the first floor of the building listed in the attached Table 1. List to the plaintiff A corporation.

Reasons

1. Judgment on the claim of the primary plaintiff A corporation

(a)as shown in the reasons for the attachment of the claim;

B. The judgment on constructive admission (Article 208(3)2 of the Civil Procedure Act) (Article 208(3) of the Civil Procedure Act) only submitted a formal written reply to deny the Plaintiff’s claim, but did not appear on the date of pleading without submitting a written reply containing specific contents despite the recommendation of amendment by the court. Thus, it is deemed that the Defendant led to confession of the facts

2. The claim of the conjunctive Plaintiff B is dismissed on the ground that it is reasonable to accept the claim of the primary Plaintiff A and therefore, the claim of the conjunctive Plaintiff B is groundless.

arrow