1. Claims 2 through 2 of the Patent C among the trial decisions rendered by the Intellectual Property Tribunal on September 11, 2019 by the case No. 2019Da1714.

1. Basic facts

(a) The name of the Defendant’s patent invention (1) invention of this case: D (2) filing date/registration date/registration number: Claim No. C (3) claims

2. Body combinations of valves 1 (hereinafter referred to as the “contests 1”); the body of the said valves 1; the re-obviousness of the said valves (hereinafter referred to as the “contests 2”); the re-obviousness of the said valves 2; the re-obviousness of the claim of the said valves 1; the re-obviousness of the claim of the said valves 2; the non-obviousness of the claim of the said valves 1; the claim of this case (hereinafter referred to as the “contests 4”); the non-obviousness of the claim of this case (hereinafter referred to as the “contests 2; the non-obviousness of the claim of this case”) shall be installed on the part of the above 1; the claim of this case which is linked to the claim of this case; and the non-obviousness of the claim of this case (hereinafter referred to as the “contests 2; hereinafter referred to as the “contests 1; hereinafter referred to as the “contests 6”) shall be removed from the above non-obviousness of the claim of this case.

According to this, it is obvious that the “satise valve........., equipped with the above components” is a clerical error (see, e.g., the first pleading protocol) and Paragraph 2.