Text
The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On December 15, 2012, around 11:40 on December 15, 2012, the Defendant: (a) discovered that the victim D(55 years of age) was urged the management office of the Emergency Countermeasure Committee of the above apartment complex, including the Defendant, to suspend the business of the victim; and (b) assaulted the victim’s body by carrying a fluor card; (c) fluoring the victim’s body with the victim’s hand while the victim was in sighted; and (d) fluoring the victim’s body into the management office by getting out of the victim’s domicile; and (c) fluoring
Summary of Evidence
1. Legal statement of witness D;
1. Application of video images CDs and field photographs-related Acts and subordinate statutes;
1. Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 260 (1) of the same Act concerning the crime; the choice of fines;
1. Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (50,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act for the inducement of a workhouse;
1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (a) of the suspended sentence (a punishment to be postponed: a fine of 300,000 won; a fine of 30,000 won for apartment management; and a long dispute between the victims who are the head of the apartment management office and the occupants, including the defendant, led to the instant case; a fine is imposed for the crime of interference with business against the victims who had been at the same time as this case; the Defendant has no special criminal record before