1. Plaintiff 1, of the distribution schedule prepared by the said court on July 18, 2016 with respect to the distribution procedure case G of the Suwon District Court.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiffs are companies that manufacture and sell lighting fixtures, landscape lighting, etc. and that mainly supplied materials, etc. to Nonparty H Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Nonindicted Company”) that mainly engage in the business of installing lighting fixtures.

B. From July 8, 2014 to May 28, 2015, the Defendant served as an internal director of the non-party company from July 8, 2014 to May 28, 2015, and thereafter became the management adviser of the non-party company.

C. On September 11, 2015, Nonparty Company filed an application for commencement of rehabilitation procedures with Suwon District Court 2015 Ma10027, and the said court rendered a decision to commence rehabilitation procedures with respect to Nonparty Company on October 21, 2015, and on January 27, 2016, the date of the order to discontinue rehabilitation procedures with respect to Nonparty Company became final and conclusive on February 12, 2016.

Attached Form

The plaintiffs' claims stated in the "principal claim" column in the distribution statement constitute public-interest claims under the Debtor Rehabilitation and Bankruptcy Act with the claims arising from material transactions, etc. after the non-party company was ordered to commence rehabilitation procedures. Meanwhile, the defendant was awarded a favorable judgment against the non-party company on June 30, 2016, stating that "the defendant (the non-party company refers to the non-party company) shall pay to the plaintiff (the defendant of this case) 39,094,150 won and 15% interest per annum from March 18, 2016 to the day of full payment."

E. However, in the Suwon District Court G dividend case, which commenced due to the deposit in the Republic of Korea, the debtor of the non-party company, the above court, on July 18, 2016, handled the defendant as well as other wage creditors, distributed KRW 39,094,150 to the defendant by 10% of the principal of the bonds in the first priority order, and prepared a distribution schedule with the content that distributes some of the amount of the principal of the bonds as stated in the attached Table in the second priority order to the plaintiffs in the second priority order (hereinafter “distribution schedule”).

F. The Plaintiffs.