beta
Text
1. Of the instant lawsuits, the creditor’s revocation claim against Defendant B, C, D, and E, which was changed in exchange in this Court.
Reasons
1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation as to this part of the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance is as follows: “G transferred from “G” on the 5th seven to nine of the grounds of the judgment of the first instance to “each transfer”; “G” on the aggregate of KRW 67,870,820, and KRW 60,009,160, and KRW 27,74,590, and KRW 37,004,000,000 in the deposit account under Defendant C’s name, and KRW 37,04,000,000 in total to the deposit account under Defendant Eul’s name, and KRW 420,00 in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, except for the case where “G transferred each transfer” on the 5th to December 1, 2010 to October 11, 2011.”
2. Determination ex officio as to the main claim (creditor's revocation claim) against Defendant B, C, D, and E among the instant lawsuit
A. In a situation where the Plaintiff’s assertion K, M, and L bears liability for damages based on tort against the Plaintiff, the conclusion of each of the pertinent gift agreements with Defendant B, C, D, and E constitutes a fraudulent act detrimental to the general obligee, such as the Plaintiff, and thus, seek the revocation of each pertinent gift agreement and the recovery therefrom.
(b) An action for revocation by a creditor shall be brought within one year from the date on which the creditor becomes aware of the cause for revocation and within five years from the date on which the juristic act was
(2) Article 406(2) of the Civil Act. The Plaintiff’s legal act subject to revocation against the said Defendants is, even based on the Plaintiff’s assertion, between K and August 25, 201; between Defendant C and M in the case of Defendant C; between August 1, 2011 and August 22, 2011; between Defendant D and L in the case of Defendant D; between L and October 111, 2011, between Defendant E and October 111, 201, respectively, and between Defendant E and October 10, 2011. The Plaintiff’s claim for revocation should be claimed only on March 20, 2017, respectively.