logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2015.07.24 2015고정2027
관세법위반등
Text

1. Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 4,000,000 won;

2. Where the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a state that operates Nibera B.

1. When any person intends to import goods, he/she shall report the name, standard, quantity and price of the relevant goods conscientiously and shall not be reduced or exempted from customs duties in any unlawful manner;

Nevertheless, the Defendant imported counterfeit trademark goods from China for the purpose of selling them to carpets in B, and imported them in the name of the Defendant, family members, etc. by abusing the fact that customs duties are exempted.

피고인은 2012. 7. 31. 수입신고번호 C로 중국으로부터 위조 샤넬 신발 1켤레, 수입가격 125,046(진정상품 시가 추정불가) 상당을 수입하면서 개인이 자가사용 물품인 것처럼 위장하는 방법으로 동 물품에 부과될 관세 16,255원을 부정하게 감면받은 것을 포함하여 별지1. 범죄일람표(부정감면)와 같이 2015. 1. 2.까지 모두 228회에 걸쳐 타인의 상표권을 침해한 위조상표 물품 228개, 수입가격 25,056,382원(진정상품 시가 추정불가)에 부과될 관세 2,717,031원 상당을 부정하게 감면받았다.

2. No act of using a trademark identical with the registered trademark of another person registered with the Korean Intellectual Property Office for goods similar to the designated goods, or using a trademark similar to the registered trademark of another person on goods identical with or similar to the designated goods.

Nevertheless, the Defendant imported counterfeit trademark goods from China for the purpose of selling them to carpet members in B, and imported one goods in private use, thereby abusing the fact that the application of the Trademark Act is excluded in the case of importing one goods infringing on intellectual property rights, and thus, violated the trademark rights of others.

The defendant on January 25, 2013

arrow