logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2015.01.15 2014도12274
정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)등
Text

The appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

The grounds of appeal are examined (to the extent of supplement in case of supplemental appellate briefs not timely filed).

The judgment below

Examining the evidence duly adopted by the court of first instance, the court below’s determination that all charges of this case were guilty on the grounds stated in its reasoning is just. Contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, the court below did not err by misapprehending the legal principles on the grounds of excluding illegality regarding the crime of forging private documents, the crime of forging private documents, the crime of causing property damage, the crime of emergency evacuation, and the act of self-help, etc.

In addition, pursuant to Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment or imprisonment without prison labor for more than ten years has been imposed, an appeal on the grounds of unfair sentencing is allowed, and thus, in this case where a fine is imposed against the defendant, the argument that the amount of the

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

arrow