A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Punishment of the crime

On October 19, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor in the Cheongju District Court for fraud, etc. on October 19, 201, and on July 18, 201, the same court sentenced six months of imprisonment with prison labor for special larceny, etc. on July 18, 201, which became final and conclusive on November 15, 201, and the said suspended sentence became null and void, and completed the execution of the final sentence in the Ansan Prison on July 12, 2012.

On July 26, 2013, at around 17:14, the Defendant: (a) took a theft by placing the victim AL operation Defendant in a plastic bag that prepared one of the victim’s main body in advance, and (b) 1,000,000 won at the victim’s market price installed therein.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement of AL;

1. On-site photographs;

1. On-siteCCTV photographs;

1. Previous records of judgment: Application of inquiry reports, such as criminal records, investigation reports (Attachment to judgments), number of days each day, the current status of confinement, previous dispositions, reporting on results of confirmation, and Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 329 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 35 of the Criminal Act among repeated offenders [the scope of punishment] The reason for sentencing under Article 35 of the Criminal Act [the period of punishment] from 1 month to 12 years [the decision of sentence] thief crime group, theft against general property, and general larceny [the special person] No person for special mitigation of identical repeated crimes who does not fall under special punishment: [the scope of recommendation] imprisonment for 10 months to 2 years (a general person] from 10 months to 2 years (a general person): There is no person for general mitigation: there is no person for general mitigation [the suspension of sentence] There is no person for general mitigation (whether or not the suspension of sentence is identical, previous, and no person for special mitigation): A negative (not less than twice) [the decision of suspension of sentence]. However, the defendant committed the crime of this case during the period of repeated crime, the defense counsel who did not recover from damage caused by this case did not return the computer of the defendant that the defendant stolen.