1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following “the second order”, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420

2. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance stating the difference between KRW 178,186,658, and KRW 178,186,658, which is the difference in the amount of KRW 230,096,658 (in the case of the complaint, KRW 446,00,000, which is the guarantee amount until 2015, and KRW 269,903,342, the actual calculation seems to have been compared to KRW 448,090,00 as stated in the evidence No. 2016, and KRW 653,60,658, which is the difference in the amount of KRW 230,00,00, which is the difference in the amount of KRW 500,000,00,000 which is the difference in the amount of KRW 230,000,000 which is the difference in the amount of KRW 20,005.).

Article 102(1) of the former Insurance Business Act (amended by Act No. 8520, Jul. 19, 2007; Act No. 10394, Jul. 23, 2010; hereinafter the same) is amended by the first instance court’s sentence No. 6. 4 as “Article 102(1) of the former Insurance Business Act (amended by Act No. 10394, Jul. 23, 2010; hereinafter the same shall apply).”

Each "Tex" of Nos. 7, 8, and 8 of the first instance judgment shall be read as "dex".

The part of the judgment of the court of first instance in 2-B(b) of the judgment of the court of first instance (from 9, 13 to 10, 5) is as follows.

In this regard, the following circumstances are as follows: (a) the Plaintiff was 24 years of age at the time of entering into the instant insurance contract; (b) her mother supported 1 and her child (three at present), and her mother was 1.6 million won of monthly interest on bank installment savings in the name of D.