Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On July 3, 2007, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 2.5 million for a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Daejeon District Court on July 3, 2007, and on March 17, 2009, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 2 million for the same crime, etc. at the same court. On January 27, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of KRW 6 months for the same crime.
On February 19, 2013, at around 23:30, the Defendant driven a Click-do car with a blood alcohol content of about 4km from around 0.069%, to the front road of the Seo-gu Seo-gu, Daejeon, Seo-gu, Daejeon, Seo-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City (Seoul Special Metropolitan City) on the front of a restaurant.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. The circumstantial statement of the employee;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquiry reports on criminal records, etc. and investigation reports (Attachment to judgment);
1. Relevant Article of the Act on the Crime and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act (Selection of Imprisonment or Imprisonment);
1. From 2003 to 2010 on the grounds of sentencing under Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation, it is considered that there are many of the same penal records including the same criminal records and the same criminal records and the same criminal records and the same criminal records and the same criminal records and the same criminal records and the five times among them are crimes related to drunk driving. However, considering the fact that the five times among them are crimes related to drunk driving, it is highly likely to repeat the crime, it was taken into account that the drinking water is somewhat low compared to the past criminal records.