Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a general restaurant operator of D.

A general restaurant is prohibited from drinking alcoholic beverages with customers or employing entertainment workers for commercial purposes. However, the Defendant was indicted by the Defendant from around 01:30 on December 20, 2013 to around 02:20 on December 20, 2013 to the F (40 years of age, remaining), and G (32 years of age, south) with the face value “including the face value and t/c value,” and the part is deleted without any changes in the indictment.

240,00 won, including 240,000 won, the staff H(33,000,000) paid and employed, made the entertainment conduct.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Application of business notification certificates, on-site photographs statutes;

1. Article 98 Subparag. 1 and Article 44(3) of the former Food Sanitation Act (amended by Act No. 12496, Mar. 18, 2014); the choice of fines for criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. In light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the record of this case, namely, the judgment on the assertion of the Defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act: (a) from the investigative agency to the court of this case, F has consistently made a statement from the investigation agency to the fact that “I am salphe at the time of the instant case, I am salphe, I am salphe with the Defendant,” and F does not seem to have made a disadvantageous statement to the Defendant in bad faith; and (b) in light of the number of residues posted on the table immediately after the instant case, it is reasonable to deem that the Defendant arranged Ha, as recorded in the judgment, to drink the employee Ha to drink together with F, etc.