1. The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 38,690,300 as well as 20% per annum from October 5, 2013 to the full payment.

1. The parties' assertion that the plaintiff, upon being entrusted with the processing of the processing of the processing of the processing of the processing of the processing of the processing of the processing of the processing of the processing of the processing of the processing of the processing of the processing of the processing of the processing of the processing of the processing of the processing of the processing of the processing of the processing of the processing of the processing of the processing of the processing of the processing of the processing of the processing of the processing of the processing of the processing of the processing of the processing of the processing of the processing of the processing of the processing of the processing of the processing of the processing of the processing of the processing of the processing of the processing of the processing of the processing of the processing of the processing of the processing of the processing of the processing of the processing of the processing of the processing of the processing of the processing of the processing of the processing of the processing of the processing

2. The following circumstances, which can be acknowledged by comprehensively considering the purport of the entire pleadings in each of the statements in Gap, Eul, Eul, Eul, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 2, Eul (including paper numbers), the defendant entrusted the processing of the processing of the processing of the processing of the processing of the processing of the processing of the vessel to the plaintiff based on the work instruction stated in the items and regulations entrusted to the plaintiff, quantity, working conditions, etc., as the captain entered in the work instruction in advance, and it seems difficult for the plaintiff to keep the captain of the vessel while supplying the product. Furthermore, as the defendant asserts, if the plaintiff filed a false claim for the processing of the processing fee as if the plaintiff did not work more than 924.38m of more than 192m, it would be questionable whether the defendant did not know it, the defendant's claim for the processing of the processing of the vessel was made once more than 1903.35m of the processed machine, and the plaintiff's claim for the processing of the processing of the vessel to the plaintiff's length and the number of the processing of the product.