logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.01.22 2014고단4268
전자기록등손괴업무방해
Text

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

Reasons

1. On April 20, 2012, the Defendant: (a) joined the raping advertising company run by the complainant C on April 20, 2012; and (b) retired on December 9, 2013.

The Defendant joined the said company operated by the complainant and set up a contract with the vehicle rap advertising design drawings, output, telephone orders, etc. prior to the withdrawal of the contract.

The Defendant, as such, made and stored a customer's brap advertising design drawing produced in the company operated by the complainants on the computer hard disc used by him, and then printed out the car brap advertising design drawing from the customer's braper stored at the customer's request for A/S, and operated the customer management by printing out A/S advertising design drawings from the customer's brap advertising design.

On December 6, 2013, the Defendant requested the complainant to increase the benefits within the “D” office for the operation of the complainant in Gwangju-si, Gwangju-si, and the complainant did not appear to include the complainant.

As such, the Defendant thought that the Defendant did not appear to receive the demand of the complainant for the increase of benefits.

The Defendant, as such, deleted 146 vehicle rap advertising designs without prior consent or consent of the complainants, arbitrarily deleted 146 vehicle rap advertising designs without obtaining prior consent or consent from the complainants, with complaints from the complainants who did not accept the demand for benefit increase.

The Defendant arbitrarily deleted 132 persons with raping advertising design drawings and 47 persons for each customer of a company operated by the complainant, as shown in the attached list of crimes, and then unilaterally notified the complainant on December 9, 2013 and retired the company without any business takeover.

As a result, vehicles of customers deleted from the above company operated by the complainants.

arrow