The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The Defendant in the instant charges is a person engaging in driving a B rocketing car.

On February 18, 2014, the Defendant driven the said car and operated the said car at the speed of 50 kilometers a speed from the two lanes to the 50 kilometers a speed from the c hotel in the direction of the C hotel in the direction of the large park.

At the same time, inasmuch as cargo cars are operating in two lanes of the victim D driving in the same direction, there was a duty of care to avoid impeding the normal traffic of other vehicles running in the same direction by operating the direction, etc. when changing the vehicle, giving notice of change of course, and giving notice of change of course in good manner.

그럼에도 이를 게을리 한 채 만연히 급차로 변경한 과실로 마침 2차로에서 운행하던 피해차량이 충격을 피해 핸들을 우측으로 꺽으면서 좌전도 되게 하였다.

Ultimately, the Defendant damaged the damaged vehicle by occupational negligence as above, which is equivalent to KRW 28,00,000,000.

2. The judgment is a crime falling under Article 151 of the Road Traffic Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim's express intent under the main sentence of Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents. According to the written agreement bound in the records, the victim can be acknowledged the facts that he/she expressed his/her intention not to be punished against the defendant on June 30, 2014, which is the date the prosecution of this case was instituted. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 (6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.