The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of facts) is also mentioned in the reasoning of appeal by the prosecutor as well as in the deliberation of the lower judgment. However, examining the specific arguments, this is also the purport of the lower judgment’s assertion of mistake of facts.

In full view of the circumstances leading up to the Defendants’ demand, method, frequency, and amount, etc. based on the evidence presented by the Prosecutor, the lower court erred by misapprehending the legal principles on the facts charged, thereby adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2. On the grounds of the circumstances stated in its reasoning, the lower court: (a) based on the evidence presented by the prosecutor, the Defendants, on the sole basis of the evidence presented by the prosecutor, did not have the intent or ability to use the money that the Defendants received from the damaged persons for the formation of a plenary session; or (b) by deceiving the victims by deceiving them

It is not sufficient to recognize the recognition.

In light of the facts charged, the lower court acquitted the instant charges.

In addition to the circumstances revealed by the court below in light of the following circumstances as revealed by the court below based on the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, the above judgment of the court below is acceptable, and there was no submission of new evidence in the court below, so there was an error of law by mistake of facts as alleged by the prosecutor in the court below.

subsection (b) of this section.

① The Defendants had the victim engage in the activities, such as practically duplicating the victim’s intention or exposing the order.

At the same time, the above F had a separate room in which the clothes were put in before production as well as the place where the box was set up, and the 6 to 70 persons who carried the 6-70 persons are going out of the body.

As such, the circumstances in which religious activities are actually carried out in the above F are confirmed.

Moreover, the Defendants on 2018.