The sentence of sentence shall be suspended for the defendant.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the victim C (V, 45 years old) and is currently in a marital relationship or divorce lawsuit, and is the father of the victim D (9 years old).

1. The Defendant, at around 10:50 on September 27, 2015, sent a door to the victim C’s house located in Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-si E apartment complex 407 Dong-gu, 2306, on the ground of his/her right to interview with the Plaintiff, but the Defendant said D’s refusal to leave the house according to the Defendant.

In the end, while the victim was in a dispute with the victim, the victim threatened the victim with "the victim who died with his or her windows".

2. The Defendant damaged property at the time and place indicated in the above paragraph 1, and in order to report the form that the victim D w w at the Defendant and C w w at the police, the Defendant deducted a cellular phone from the market price of the victim D owned by the only victim D, which is equivalent to KRW 297,000, and damaged the wald by taking the cell phone into account the seed floor.

3. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in paragraph (1) above, considers that the victim D does not leave the victim according to the Defendant.

One thing is the victim's bomb and bomb, and the victim bombed on the bed of the bed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. C Legal statement;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes entered in the written statement of victim D;

1. Relevant Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Code of the Suspension of Sentence (100,000 won for punishment, one million won for detention in the workhouse, one day for the spouse and children under the divorce lawsuit, and there is no room to deem that the defendant has the same history as that of the defendant, and that the actual punishment against the defendant is necessary in light of the attitude of the acts shown in the facts charged. However, the crime of this case, including the same kind of power, is committed.