logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2020.09.10 2020고단3844
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a Brane car.

On April 24, 2020, the Defendant driven the said car at a shooting distance in front of the Dun Use Room in Daegu Suwon-gu C on April 24, 2020, and continued the car at a speed of about 5km per hour from E to F school.

Since there is a cross-section in which traffic is not controlled due to the absence of signal, etc., and the wide side road and the narrow side road are crossings, in such a case, a person engaged in driving service has the duty of care to prevent accidents, such as reducing the speed prior to entering the intersection on a narrow road and driving a cross-section on a road with a wide width, and yield the course to the vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and did not confirm the progress of other vehicles on a narrow road, and entered the narrow road with a width of mast by direct negligence, and left the H apartment surface from the G elementary school room, which is a road with a wide width, to the H apartment surface, the victim I (Nam, 31 years old), who was driving at the J high-water drive, was placed as the fronter of the low-income vehicle, and suffered injury to the victim, such as the right shoulder-wing sprink, which requires approximately eight weeks of medical treatment.

2. Determination

(a) Applicable provisions: Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

(b) Crimes of non-violation of intention: The main sentence of Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic

(c) Judgment dismissing public prosecution: Subparagraph 6 of Article 327 of the Criminal Procedure Act (a criminal agreement is submitted on August 27, 2020, which states that the victim expressed his/her intention not to be punished against the defendant on August 27, 2020, after the institution of

arrow