Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is one of the members of the victim C (48 tax) and D apartment in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

On April 8, 2016, the Defendant (around 23:30 on April 23:30, 2016) and the members of the redevelopment district and mobile phone group Kakao dialogue and the victim want to die.

“On April 9, 2016, around 00:30, the Defendant met as one-day day on the ground of the insulting writing of “......” From the Elleyway adjacent to D Apartment of Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “Seoul Metropolitan Government”) around 00:30 on April 9, 2016, the Defendant saw the victim’s face by taking six times due to his own drinking, leaving the victim over five times, including the face of the victim, three times, the blue blus, and the blus, and the face of the blus, 10 times, and caused the victim’s injury, such as an internal flusium, which requires medical treatment for about 21 days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. C’s statement;

1. Application of CCTV-related Acts and subordinate statutes, such as a report on the occurrence of violence, a written diagnosis of injury, on-site map, photographs of injury, Kakao Stockholm conversation;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of an alternative fine (to take into account the following circumstances):

1. The reason for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (the scope of recommended punishment in accordance with the sentencing guidelines) of the Act on the Attraction of the Deninary Station is not subject to the sentencing guidelines. As such, the crime of this case is not subject to the sentencing guidelines. [Determination of sentence] The crime of this case is likely to inflict an injury on the victim by prices at a number of times due to the emotional time during the Kakakao Stockholm dialogues, and is highly likely to inflict an injury on the victim, and the degree of injury suffered by the victim is not easy.

In addition, the Defendant repeated the instant crime even though he had been punished several times for the same kind of crime such as violence.

However, the defendant made efforts to recover damage, such as the death of the victim several times, and the victim now does not want the punishment of the defendant.