logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원성남지원 2016.04.27 2016가합200671
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Defendant: (a) from October 19, 2014 to Plaintiff A, KRW 37,104,065, respectively, and each of them.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Status 1 of a party is a network D (hereinafter “the network”).

ii) the E vehicle (hereinafter referred to as “instant vehicle”);

A) A person who died of an accident as set forth below while driving, and the Plaintiff A’s wife, Plaintiff B, and C are children of the Deceased. 2) The Defendant is the construction manager of national highways No. 37 (hereinafter “instant roads”).

B. From October 18, 2014 to 06:31 the following day, the Deceased, who caused the instant accident, was driving the instant vehicle at around 19:00 and caused an accident to shock the PE protection fences installed on the left side of the proceeding direction to the right 200 meters away from the front line of the voice intersection (hereinafter “the instant accident site”) while driving the instant road from the front line to the voice room as the birth volume of the voice Eup of the Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheong the instant road (hereinafter “instant accident”).

As a result, the instant vehicle separated from the road and fell into the road at least four meters, and the Deceased died at a low-weight show around 07:55 on the same day.

C. The accident location of this case’s accident location is as indicated below, with the lower limit 40 km/h lower direction lamps (the border photograph part of the road connecting two multi-level crossing roads). The construction is scheduled in the straight line by the U.S. road, and the present is to proceed to the right side of the point leading to the national highways No. 36. At the same time, the exhauster sign is installed at intervals of 17-18 meters (the starting point is installed only immediately before the road location), and the PE bank fence is installed before and after the accident location.

The relevant Acts and subordinate statutes concerning the structure and facility standards of the road of this case are as shown in the attached Form.

[Ground of recognition] In the absence of dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 5, 12, 15 through 21, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 5 and 6 (including the number of pages), or

arrow