A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 4, 2017, the Defendant: (a) received a guide that “The Defendant shall file a civil petition with the competent viewing on the following day for the issue of the drinking value already paid by a policeman E, a police officer belonging to the D District Police Station of the Chungcheongbuk Police Station, etc., who reported 112 on the ground that he/she had a excessive drinking value on the day.”

Nevertheless, the Defendant reported the same 112 report of the same 23:50 on the same day and sent the same procedure to the said E, and received notification from the said E, and responded to the defect that E leaves another site, opened the back door of the patrol vehicle on which A self-employed E, etc. was on board, and looked at the demand of the police officers who continued to turn off with both arms, and followed E in the process of getting off the disturbance by standing at the back seat of the said patrol vehicle and towing it to E and other police officers.

The defendant continued to take out tobacco in the main machine and again prevents the back of the patrol chief, and “in fluence of internal imprisonment” is also a impule.

N one does not conflict with each other.

B. The police officers, including the above E, threatened with the threat of Mad. D. C., anywhere, and so on, so that police officers, including E, may not leave the site.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the handling of 112 reported cases.

2. When the Defendant who damaged public goods was arrested as a current offender on the same date and time as stated in the foregoing paragraph (1) at the same time and place as indicated in the foregoing paragraph (1), and as a result of the crime of the above paragraph (1), the Defendant’s act of 77,05 won for repairing the patrol vehicle, walking along several times on the back of the patrol vehicle, which the police officers listed in the above paragraph (1), is stated in the facts charged of KRW 77,050 as “7,050.” However, in light of the written estimate (in the investigation record, 52 pages), it shall be deemed that “7,05 won” is written in writing.

It has been damaged to be reasonable.

Accordingly, the Defendant damaged the goods used by public offices.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. E.