logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.09.05 2018나50208
소유권이전등기
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of the first instance, and thus, it is also accepted by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

[The grounds for appeal by the defendant are not significantly different from the argument in the first instance court, and the facts finding and determination in the first instance court are justifiable in view of the evidence No. 2 through No. 8 submitted in the first instance court’s evidence duly adopted and examined at the first instance court. The defendant presented evidence No. 1-2 by asserting that the plaintiff did not cultivate the land of this case before 201, but according to the video No. 9-1 through No. 4, it can be recognized that the land of this case is already cultivated in 2008. Thus, the part of evidence No. 1-2 of the plaintiff’s evidence No. 1-2 stating that the land of this case is already cultivated shall not be trusted. Thus, the plaintiff’s claim of this case should be cited for the reasons, and the judgment of the first instance court that makes the conclusion is justifiable, and thus, the defendant’s appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

arrow