Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Punishment of the crime

On March 16, 2016, while the defendant was working as the director of the management office of the apartment house, the defendant requested the chairperson E (at least 60 years of age) of the representative council of the occupants of the above apartment and the representative of the Dong to replace the director of the management office of the above apartment and the defendant was placed in the location to be retired on April 15, 2016.

1. On April 11, 2016, at around 19:45, the Defendant decided to broadcast from the broadcasting room of the above apartment management office to the occupants of 567 units by determining that “if any longer time is delayed, the Defendant would have committed a crime larger than the thickness of the occupants. The Chairperson did not negotiate with respect to the next defect in 10 years, thereby causing some damage on the ground of the completion of the prescription period. The Defendant waste management expenses by newly installing equipment that was paid or anticipated to be used for repair and partial repair, and the cost of construction is paid or anticipated, and the Defendant did not proceed with a fair bid procedure, and then waste management expenses by installing new equipment that can be used for repair and partial repair, and the Chairperson seems to have deleted and promulgated, regardless of what is and how much security guards have come to close, and the Chairperson seems to have come to have closed the door in favor of the Defendant.

The security guards were dismissed.

Along with the fact that the president filed a complaint with the prosecutor, he/she tried to clarify the wrong parts, and that the deceased person's body is so strupted.

However, the issue of defect repair works continued to be negotiated until August 2015. Since the issue of defect repair works had been urged by mail proving the contents thereafter, it was irrelevant to the damage caused by the completion of prescription, and even if all relevant documents were kept at the management office, the defendant did not confirm it, there was no fact that there was unfair progress in bidding related to construction works, and the parking management system used for more than five years was replaced with new equipment due to frequent breakdown, and waste management fees.