A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal history] The Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment for fraud at the Incheon District Court on June 15, 2016, and such judgment became final and conclusive on December 6, 2016.

[2] The Defendant, along with an employee under the name of the organization of Bosing “Singing,” made a false statement that “a loan is sent to an account designating a nominal amount, such as deposit, because it is possible to grant a loan to an unspecified number of unspecified domestic victims,” and conspired to receive money from the victims. According to the above public offering, the name infinites, upon the above public offering, made the said deception to a large number of victims, and intended to collect the account and cash card to receive money from the victims, and the Defendant made the withdrawal of the money remitted to the account designated by the victim under the name infinites’ order, or shared the role of receiving the cash card to be used for the Bosing crime.

1. On March 7, 2016, the Defendant, in violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act, acquired access media by taking over the following media by taking over physical cards, etc. connected to an enterprise bank account (E) connected to Kwikset service provider’s account under D’s name, which was sent by Kwikset service provider, on the roads adjacent to CMat in Ansan-si B, Ansan-si, Asan-si, under the direction of a person without a name.

2. Fraud;

A. On February 2016, 2016, the Defendant and the Defendant conspiredd with the victim F to provide loans to the victim F at a non-sceptic place.

To send money to cover insurance;

G. “F.D.” made a false statement to the effect that “.”

However, the facts are that the defendant was not a credit service provider, and even if he was paid money from the victim, the defendant did not have the intent and ability to grant a loan to the victim, and the defendant, in collusion with the name of the injured party, deceiving the victim as above, and the person who was under the name of G on March 4, 2016.