logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2011.06.30 2011고합432
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(절도)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

【Criminal Power】 The Defendant was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment with prison labor for larceny at the Seoul Southern District Court on March 26, 1984; on July 15, 1985, the Seoul Southern District Court sentenced one year and one year and six months of imprisonment with prison labor for special larceny at the Seoul Southern District Court on November 6, 1987; and 190

3. On July 11, 1997, the Seoul High Court sentenced each of the offenses against the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes to one year and six months, and sentenced each of the offenses against the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes to one year and six months, and sentenced each of the offenses against the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes to one year and six months on May 21, 2004 by the Seoul Central District Court. On September 18, 2007, the Daejeon District Court sentenced each of the offenses against the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes to one year and six months, and completed the execution of the punishment by the original prison on January 6, 201, after having been sentenced each of the offenses against the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes by the Seoul Central District Court on August 20, 2009.

【Criminal Facts of Crimes】 On April 29, 201, at around 00:08, the Defendant discovered the victim D who was under the influence of alcohol at the Cheongyang-dong subway 1, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, the Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government subway Station platform, and laid down the victim’s hand onto the port inside the right side of the two uniforms, and then taken 26,000 won in cash owned by the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant habitually stolen the victim's property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Video-recording data and video-recording;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused;

1. Statement of the police statement of the victim D;

1. Police seizure records, list of seizure and photographs of seized articles;

1. A report on investigation (a closed photograph of CCTV recording on the surface of a police station);

1. Previous records of judgment: Criminal records, etc., inquiry reports, investigation reports, and personal identification records;

1. Habituality: The defendant and the defense counsel are as follows.

arrow