logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.01.28 2015고정2762
공인중개사의업무및부동산거래신고에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a certified broker who operated a Dauthorized Brokerage Office located in the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Seoul from around February 2010 to February 2012.

No broker, etc. shall make a judgement on important matters relating to transaction of the relevant object of brokerage by means of false words and behavior or by other means.

Around October 4, 2010, the Defendant knew that the said apartment owner would offer an apartment as a collateral and obtain a loan, but did not explain such fact to G, even though he knew that the said apartment owner would have been aware that the said F would have offered an apartment as a collateral and obtain a loan, and did not enter such matters in the actual relation of rights or matters of rights that have not been disclosed in the statement confirming the object of brokerage.

In addition, on the 15th day of the same month, the remainder payment date, even though the establishment of the right to collateral security was registered on the above apartment on the basis of the maximum amount of the claim 134 million won, the G did not notify the fact that the right to collateral security has been registered.

As a result, the defendant caused the judgement of the client by false words and other means on important matters concerning transaction of the object of brokerage.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness H;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the suspect by each prosecutor against the defendant or F;

1. The record of recording (the defendant and his defense counsel did not intentionally express to the lessee, etc. as to the fact that the defendant would receive a loan, but did not know the specific amount, time, etc. of the loan, and the fact that the contract of this case was not finalized at the time of the contract of this case does not have any duty to confirm and explain to

However, the following circumstances recognized by each of the above evidence, and in cases where a lessor concludes a lease contract before acquiring ownership, in particular, a lessor's loan.

arrow