logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.11.11 2020고정1427
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in the electric kickboard driving.

On 19:20 on 27. 205. 27. 2020, the Defendant operated the electric kickboard, and sent the three-lane road in front of the Seoul Nowon-gu Seoul Nowon-gu Seoul Nowon-gu Office 224 Seoul Nowon-do along the three-lanes from the offline to the offline of the street.

On the front of that place, there is a crosswalk in which traffic signals and signals are installed, so it is confirmed whether a person engaged in driving service has a road by properly checking the front side and the left side of the road, and even though the defendant has an occupational duty to safely drive the vehicle in accordance with the signals of the vehicle and prevent the accident in advance, he neglected this duty while neglecting his duty and driving the bicycle front side of the bicycle side of the victim B (Nam, 29 years old) who cross the crosswalk from the left side of the crosswalk to the right side in accordance with the pedestrian signals of the crosswalk by failing to comply with the signals.

The Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as the 3rd son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. B written statements;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing vehicle photographs;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (1) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the relevant criminal facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and the

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The sentence shall be determined like the order, taking into consideration the following: (a) there is no previous conviction in sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act; (b) the accident is relatively minor; (c) the victim does not want the punishment by mutual consent with the victim after the indictment; (d) the victim’s fault appears in the part of the victim; and (e) the victim’s fault appears to be economically difficult due to the

arrow