logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.10.27 2017고단4412
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, who operated “D” in Osan-si, from March 15, 2016 to December 19, 2016, provided that, from the point of view of installation of a glass window to the road, the Defendant provided visitors with the above boarding room at the one-story room (hereinafter “one-time room”), or provided visitors with the above boarding accommodation, and received the time desired by male guests who sought the above boarding accommodation and the price for sexual traffic from sexual intercourse, and then, provided sexual intercourses with male guests E (hereinafter “F”).

Accordingly, the defendant committed commercial sex acts such as arranging sexual traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E by the prosecution;

1. Each protocol concerning the examination of the police officers in relation to E, G, and H;

1. Statement protocol by the police for E;

1. E statements;

1. The description of a note, a real estate lease agreement, and each currency;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc. concerning facts constituting an offense, and selection of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Punishment of acts, such as arranging additional collection of sexual traffic. Article 25 (Written Statement of E and Statement of Interrogation of Suspects to Prosecutors' Office)

1. The fact that the instant crime was committed despite the record of the same kind of fine for the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, is disadvantageous.

Considering the scale, profits, and operating periods of the instant business establishment, the Defendant would dispose of the current female accommodation and engage in other business and will not repeat the same.

The same type as the order shall be determined in consideration of various circumstances.

arrow