1. The lawsuit of this case shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of retrial shall be borne by the defendant;

purport, purport, ..

1. Following the conclusion of the judgment subject to a retrial is apparent or obvious in records in this court.

원고는, 원고가 흡수합병한 주식회사 A가 피고와 사이에 대금 1,400만 원에 피고가 스텝 모터 드라이버 사양 일체를 개발하는 내용의 개발용역계약을 체결하고, 피고에게 선급금으로 420만 원을 지급하였으며, 575만 원 상당의 자재 등 장비를 구매하여 제공하였는데 피고의 귀책사유로 위 계약을 해제하였는데도 피고가 선급금 등을 반환하지 않는다며 피고를 상대로 수원지방법원 성남지원 2018가소940호로 선급금, 장비대금, 손해배상금의 지급을 구하는 소를 제기했고, 위 법원은 2018. 3. 22. 원고의 청구를 인용하는 판결(이하 ‘제1심판결’이라 한다)을 선고했다.

B. Accordingly, the Defendant appealed as Suwon District Court 2018Na62232 against the judgment of the first instance, and the said court revoked the judgment of the first instance on November 1, 2018, and rendered a judgment that partially accepted the Plaintiff’s claim only for advance payment and equipment costs (hereinafter “the judgment on review”).

C. The Defendant, who is dissatisfied with the judgment subject to a retrial, appealed by Supreme Court Decision 2018Da300463, but on April 11, 2019, the final appeal was dismissed, and the judgment subject to a retrial became final and conclusive.

On July 17, 2019, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit for the retrial of this case against the judgment subject to a retrial.

2. A lawsuit seeking retrial on the legitimacy of a lawsuit seeking retrial is permitted only when there exist grounds stipulated in each subparagraph of Article 451(1) of the Civil Procedure Act. The grounds that limitedly list the grounds for retrial in a civil lawsuit are to relieve the relevant party of damage caused by an error in the final judgment that became final and conclusive, and to maintain the legal stability of the final and conclusive judgment, preventing unnecessary retrial and

(See Supreme Court Order 2014Do154 Decided November 12, 2015). The Defendant’s advance payment received by the Defendant while rescinding the development services agreement with the Plaintiff.