beta
Text
The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.
Reasons
Plaintiff’s assertion
In the process of establishing an Internet line, communications companies, including the defendant companies, conducted the plaintiff's roof of the plaintiff's building, caused the whole gymnasium, caused the weight between the board and the board, and damaged the roof of the equipment presumed to have been in possession.
Accordingly, the defendant company is obligated to pay the agreed amount because it agreed to compensate for damages by recognizing the responsibility of the defendant company, and even if the fact of the agreement is not recognized, it is liable to compensate for the damage caused by the roof damage caused by joint tort with other communications companies
The evidence presented by the Plaintiff as to the claim for the agreed amount is insufficient to recognize the fact that the Defendant Company finally agreed to compensate the Plaintiff for the damage caused by roof damage. Therefore, this part of the claim cannot be accepted.
In full view of the overall purport of the arguments and arguments as to the claim for damages, as a result of Gap evidence Nos. 4-1 to 5 video, and this court’s on-site inspection, the defendant corporation Eul delegated the work of installing the Internet, etc. to the defendant corporation, and the installation engineer belonging to the defendant corporation C has loaded the roof of the plaintiff’s building for the installation of the Internet, drilling the part of the roof of the plaintiff’s building, and has been changed and worn out (However, there is insufficient evidence to acknowledge that the hole excavated on the roof of the plaintiff’s building has been damaged normally because it was cut between the board and the board as alleged by the plaintiff). However, the hole excavated on the roof of the plaintiff’s building is not concentrated in the place presumed to be the moving route of the installation engineer of the defendant corporation, but it is difficult to deem that the above hole was damaged due to the fall on the roof and the escape level (D4 pages).