Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

At around 19:30 on February 22, 201, the Defendant driven a Dana car with approximately 2 km from the front parking lot of the house located in the Seocheon-gun, Seocheon-gun, Seocheon-gun to the front day of the military police police inspector in the same military area, while under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.084%.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to reports on detection of drivers and circumstantial statements of drivers;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal Crimes and Articles 148-2 subparagraph 1 and 44 (1) of the former Road Traffic Act (amended by Act No. 10790, Jun. 8, 201);

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. The summary of the facts charged is a person engaging in driving of a D vehicle.

On February 22, 2011, the Defendant driven the above vehicle while under the influence of alcohol of 0.084% with blood alcohol concentration at around 19:30 on February 22, 201, and continued to proceed from the front parking lot of the house located in Seocheon-gun, Seocheon-gun, Seocheon-gun, Seocheon-gun to the military police inspector's autopsy room located in Yacheon-gu.

At the time, in such a case at night, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to see the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and to accurately operate the steering direction and the system.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, proceeded with a bend road by negligence while neglecting it, received an inspection fash installed in the safety zone from the driver's seat of the said vehicle as an even part of the driver's seat of the said vehicle, and led to this shock, the Defendant shocked the F f f nap of the E driving that the Bash proceeds normally from the opposite vehicle.

The Defendant, due to the above occupational negligence, suffered from the victim G (50 years of age) who was accompanied by the Defendant’s vehicle from the right blue column and the dives column in need of treatment for about two weeks.