Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a rocketing car.

On November 6, 2014, at around 17:50, the Defendant was driving a U.S. road of Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 403-1, along the four-lanes in the direction of the U.S. rock, while driving a U.S. as one-lane in the direction of the U.S. rock.

At night and at the same time, the left turn and the walking signal are possible to be a U-turn, so there was an occupational duty to confirm the signal, and to prevent the accident due to the negligence of the driver's duty of care, which was caused by the driver's negligence on the part adjacent to the driver's right-hand signal of the victim D (the age of 23) who was on the part adjacent to the driver's vehicle due to the driver's vehicle's fault, and the victim E (the age of 23) who was on the right-hand right-hand side of the driver's vehicle was received by the victim D and Oratobab, and the victim E (the age of 23) who was on the top of the victim's driving vehicle exceeded the floor, thereby suffering from the victim's injury, such as an injury, such as a flador minction of the left-hand executives requiring about 16 weeks treatment, and the victim's injury, such as the light d

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Part of the protocol concerning the examination of suspect regarding D; and

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (verification of damage caused by accident), investigation reports (report on telephone conversations of a victim);

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents under Relevant Acts concerning criminal facts, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act [Scope of Recommendation] General Traffic Accidents of Type I (In April to October), there is no basic area (decision of sentence] / there is a person who has a special appearance] / The decision of sentence / the defendant acknowledges a mistake and repents it, the defendant is covered by a comprehensive insurance, there is no other penalty force except that he has been punished twice by a fine, and all other circumstances including the circumstances of the accident in this case, the defendant's age, character and behavior, family relation, environment, etc. are considered as the order.