logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2019.08.13 2018가단62227
소유권말소등기
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On June 17, 2013, Jeju-si, Jeju-si, which was originally owned by the Plaintiff (hereinafter “D land before the instant subdivision”), D forest 2858 square meters (hereinafter “the instant land”) was divided into D forest 715 square meters (hereinafter “D land”) and C forest 2143 square meters in Jeju-si, Jeju-si, respectively. On July 5, 2013, the Defendant, who is the Plaintiff’s father, completed the registration of transfer of ownership with respect to D land (hereinafter “D land before the instant subdivision”), as gifted on July 5, 2013.

B. On December 30, 2013, C land prior to the instant partition was divided into C Forest C forest land and 1761 square meters (hereinafter “C land after the instant partition”); among them, one-third of the above shares, the ownership transfer registration of which was completed under the Defendant’s name, was divided into “instant land share”; and 382 square meters of E forest and land in Jeju (hereinafter “instant land”).

After the division of this case, the land category of D and E was changed to each site on March 4, 2014.

C. On January 7, 2016, the Plaintiff sold 2/3 of the shares, excluding the shares transferred to the Defendant among the land C after the instant partition, to FF farming association corporations, and completed the registration of ownership transfer on January 13, 2016.

On the other hand, on May 27, 2013, the Defendant: (a) filed a construction report on the construction of a Class 1 neighborhood living facility with a building area of 111.22 square meters on the ground among D land before the instant partition (limited to D land after the instant partition); (b) filed a new report on the construction of a Class 1 neighborhood living facility with a building area of 715 square meters on the land before the instant partition (limited to D land); (c) on December 16, 2013, the Defendant filed a new report on the construction of a Class 1 neighborhood living facility with a building area of 184.39 square meters on the land before the instant partition (applicable to E land); and (d) completed the construction of the instant building on January 6, 2014.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, Gap evidence 2-1, 2, Gap evidence 3, Eul evidence 2-1, 2, 3, and 2-2.

arrow