1. The plaintiff's respective claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. As to the real estate listed in paragraph (1) of the attached Table No. 1 (hereinafter “real estate No. 1 of this case”), the registration of transfer of ownership was completed from Non-Party B to Defendant B on April 10, 1955 (the above registration was completed in accordance with the Act on Special Measures for the Registration, etc. of Ownership of General Farmland, which was in force at the time of the enforcement of the above registration), and the registration of transfer of ownership was completed from Defendant B to Defendant C on February 24, 2015 as the receipt of the Daejeon District Court No. 6215 on February 24, 2011.

B. As to the real estate listed in the attached list No. 2 (hereinafter “the real estate No. 2”), the registration of transfer of ownership was completed from the above F to Defendant D on January 3, 1969 as the receipt of No. 9315 on June 15, 1984 by the Daejeon District Court, Seosan Branch of the Daejeon District Court (hereinafter “the real estate No. 2”), and the registration of transfer of ownership was completed from Defendant D to Defendant E on September 5, 191, which was in force at the time of the registration (the above registration was completed by the Act on Special Measures for the Registration, etc. of Real Estate Ownership).

C. The above F was registered as deceased on April 28, 1982 on a transcript of the removed copies, but actually died on July 2, 1953.

The plaintiff is the above F female of F.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without a partial dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, Eul evidence No. 1 (including additional number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiff's assertion that the above FF had already died on July 2, 1953. Thus, since the sale and purchase of each of the grounds for registration registered by the defendant B and D is obviously false on that date after the death of the above F. Accordingly, each of the registrations in the name of the defendant B and D is the invalid cause, and the registration in the name of the defendant C and E transferred is also the invalid cause. Thus, the defendants are obligated to cancel the above registration of ownership transfer.

3. It shall be governed by the Act on Special Measures for the Registration of Traffic Transfer.