The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds of appeal is as follows: (a) the informant of this case, in collusion with someone else, put the defendant into a vessel by a method of a prompt word "delivery" in which the shopping bags of this case, which contain philophones, are delivered to the defendant; and (b) the defendant was unaware of whether the shopping bags of this case contain philophones.

2. Determination

A. The lower court determined as follows: (a) around December 12, 2013, the evidence and the following circumstances recognized as follows; (b) the instant informant stated that: (c) around 20 p.m. business places in Songpa-gu Seoul, O (the lower judgment stated “G” but appears to be clerical error; hereinafter the same shall apply) sent to the Defendant from males using mobile phones; and (d) the Defendant sent the shopping bags containing penphones to the Defendant; (c) the instant informant and O mobile phone users and the Defendant’s cell phone users and the Defendant’s cell phone users and the Defendant’s cell phone use; (d) the Defendant sent the instant text messages to the Defendant on 20 p.m. 1 p. 1, 2013, on 12.m., the Defendant sent the instant message to the Defendant on 20 p.m. 1, 2013, on 20 p.m., the Defendant sent the instant phone phone number 1 to the Defendant.

“H.” to the question of the investigator.