logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2014.11.27 2014고정1398
상해
Text

All of the prosecutions of this case are dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of the facts charged

1. On November 11, 2013, around 10:00, Defendant A demanded the owner of the building to pay additional costs of civil engineering works at the site of the E Civil Works Works in Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-do, and the victim B (manam and 63 years old) who is the owner of the building, but the victim refused to pay additional costs as he did not complete the construction work as originally designed, and the victim did assault the victim’s right-hand hand by booming the bat.

2. Defendant B, as a matter of additional construction costs at the same time and place as in the above Paragraph (1) above, committed assaulting the victim’s left side knife by having spawn in hand with spawns.

2. Each of the facts charged in the instant case is a crime falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act. The victims expressed their intention not to prosecute on November 27, 2014, which was after the instant indictment was instituted, and thus all of the instant indictments are dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow