logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원고양지원 2020.02.19 2019가단10746
채무부존재확인
Text

1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The Plaintiff asserts as follows as the cause of the instant claim.

The Plaintiff promised to pay KRW 12 to 140,00 per day to the Plaintiff for the “carcing work” with the team consisting of five members of the Plaintiff. As the Plaintiff promised to pay KRW 12 to 12-140,000 per day from March 2016, the Plaintiff performed the carcing work in accordance with the work order at the factory operated by C with four police officers from mid-2016, and the employees of C performed the carcing work in accordance with the work order at the factory operated by C. When the carcing was caused during the wind supplied to the original supply company, which does not meet the new carcing requirement, the Plaintiff removed the carcing and inferior work together with the team, while the Plaintiff requested C to correct the carcing work on several occasions, but the defective goods continued and the volume of the work increased, suspended the carcing work on April 2016.

C The Plaintiff’s KRW 5 million on March 22, 2016, and the same year

4. The Plaintiff paid a total of KRW 8 million, including KRW 500,000 and KRW 3 million on the 111.3 million of the same month, and distributed the money to the team members. The Plaintiff and team members run cart from March 2016 to April 2016, and the remaining amount not received from C are KRW 18.65 million in total.

Recently, a credit information company urged the Plaintiff to pay KRW 5,487,100 to the Plaintiff, who is delegated with the debt collection by the Defendant operating the “D” company. As a result of the confirmation by the Plaintiff, the Defendant delegated the debt collection of KRW 5,100,000 to the said credit information company, which is part of the amount of KRW 8,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000

2. We examine ex officio the lawfulness of the instant lawsuit.

A. If the purport of the claim of the confirmation is lawful, the confirmation is sought along with the purport of the judgment of confirmation.

arrow