Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and four months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[2019 Highest 2124]

1. On March 25, 2012, the Defendant stated that “A victim B would have repaid 5 million won if he/she borrowed 5 million won to be used as a full-time source of revenue” from the day of the large exhibition around 14:00 to the victim B.

However, the defendant did not have any particular property at the time, and even if he borrowed the money from the victim due to a large amount of living expenses, including the loan of several million won, there was no intention or ability to repay the money.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, as seen above, received a total of KRW 18 million from around May 2012, including deceiving the victim and receiving KRW 5 million in cash from the victim, namely, from the victim who was in his/her seat, from around May 2, 2012, from around five times, as shown in the List of Crimes (1).

2. On September 25, 2012, the Defendant, from the Defendant’s home located in the Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City (Seoul Special Metropolitan City Mayor) to the victim E, he/she would have repaid the Defendant after the completion of this mold, if he/she loans KRW 1 million to the victim E

The phrase “the meaning was false.”

However, the defendant did not have any specific property at the time and did not have any intent or ability to repay money from the victim even if he/she borrowed money from the victim due to a large amount of living expenses, including several million won of bonds.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, as seen above, received a total of KRW 1,60,000 from September 29, 2012, including by deceiving the victim and receiving KRW 1,00,000 from the victim to the account on the same day, and received a total of KRW 1,1,60,000 from September 29, 2012.

[2019 Highest 2490] The Defendant was from September 2016 to February 2019, a person who operated the gathering of the trade name I in the name of his/her father H in the name of his/her father from Seo-gu F G from Daejeon, Seo-gu, Daejeon to February 2019.

1. On December 19, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around December 19, 2018, to the victim J, a leading fish supplier, the said I restaurant, “the chief of the office has not received the frequency after being prepared.”

It shall be approved at the end of 12 months on the face of the week in which the dissolution, such as light fishing, is delivered.

“...”

However, in fact, the defendant is cumulative while operating the above restaurant.