A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] On October 26, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to 6 months of imprisonment with prison labor and 2 years of suspended execution to the Daejeon District Court on October 26, 2017, and such judgment became final and conclusive on July 20, 2018.

[2] On January 1, 2018, the Defendant: (a) 22:18, at the main point of “H” located in Daejeon Middle-gu, Daejeon; (b) took a bath to other customers within the same main point without any justifiable reason; and (c) reported to the police by the owner of the said main point to the police; and (d) retired from the said main point of “H” upon receiving a request for withdrawal from the Police Officer of the International Police Station of Daejeon District of Daejeon, who called for the said place.

Since then, the defendant, by finding the above main points, she saw to be a trial allowance to the customers who were in the above main points without any justifiable reason, and around 22:51 on the same day, after receiving the second report of the above main place of business, he she went out of the main place after receiving a request for the second withdrawal from K and Police Officers J to get out of the main place.

The Defendant, with the Defendant, was posted out of the above week, by K and PatrolJ on a L patrol vehicle to leave the scene for the purpose of the crime prevention patrol, etc. within the jurisdiction of the Defendant, left the scene, laid a disposable log in his own possession on the floor, and took the above police officer’s bath. On the other hand, the Defendant continued to open the front door of the patrol vehicle into force, and put the knife, put the knife, and increased, and the Defendant is the former police officer.

It is whether Article 1 of the law is such a provision.

The police assaulted the above police officers for about three minutes, such as putting a bath and booming a plaque.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of official duties by the police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Statement made by the police to J;

1. Each investigation report and accompanying documents;

1. Application of a copy of judgment;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of punishment for the crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. The latter part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, provided that the sentencing of Article 39(1) is made.