logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.07.20 2017나8417
대출금
Text

1. The appeal by the defendant (appointed party) is dismissed;

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the defendant (appointed party).

Reasons

1. The reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance are as stated in the judgment of the court of first instance except for the part concerning the "claim for invalidity of an agreement appropriation according to terms and conditions" from 9th to 10th 13th e.g., (3) of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, the part concerning the "claim for Repayment of Claims" shall be cited pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, and the dividends distributed from an auction to an auction to exercise the security right of the defendant's assertion fall short of the extinguishment of all of the secured claims owned by the secured parties, the designation of appropriation or appropriation of appropriation under the Civil Act shall not be allowed and the interest and the original amount shall not be appropriated in order. However, the secured claims of this case are not 117 original claims for loans to 117 households of this case, 26th to 28th e.g., interest claims of this case, 3rd e., the above principal claims, and 108 years to e., 208 years e.

arrow