A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant found that the victim C was suffering from the starting operation of the vehicle with a more 19.39 million won, which is the victim's ownership in front of the store store in the 2019:30 on March 19, 2016, when the victim C had weak ability to discern things or make decisions due to the division of editing type.

The Defendant was driving a vehicle after going on the vehicle of the Poter and then stolen it by means of driving.

The Defendant, “2016 Highest 190, the 2016 Highest 190,” in the state of lacking the ability or decision-making ability to discern things due to the division of editing type, was stolen from G Mart operated by the victim F, the victim F, the 19:30 on March 20, 2016, at the expense of the victim F, the victim F, the victim F, the victim of which was the victim, at the expense of KRW 2,00.

Summary of Evidence

"2016 Highest 1083"

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. C’s statement;

1. References to report internal investigation (the details of arrest of the suspect and appendix of photographs of damaged articles) 2016 Height 1990;

1. The defendant's partial statement in court (as at the date of the eight public trial in court);

1. Application of F’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment for a crime;

1. Article 10 (2) and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate mental and physical weakness;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution [The defendant and his defense counsel claim that the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case in the state of mental disorder caused by mental division. Thus, according to the evidence adopted and investigated by the court, it is acknowledged that the defendant was in a state of lacking the ability or decision-making ability to discern things due to editing mental disorder at the time of committing each of the crimes of this case. However, the defendant will change things due to the above disease.