logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2020.02.12 2019나310281
공사대금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

The grounds for appeal by the plaintiff citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance, and the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court of first instance and the evidence additionally adopted and examined by the court of first instance are justified.

Therefore, the reasoning of the judgment of this court is as follows, except where the plaintiff added or emphasized the argument that the plaintiff added or emphasized in this court, and the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is stated in the same reasoning as that of the judgment of the court of first instance.

The purport of the Reasons for Appeal for Additional Decision is that the Plaintiff is a party to the instant interior contract as a party to the instant interior contract.

The plaintiff has operated the "E" jointly with the husband, and the defendant C was well aware of this fact, and the above defendant not only had experience in performing the plaintiff's work through D in the exhibition hall of the Ulsan-gun Office in 2017, but also the plaintiff bears the cost of the project including the project in this case and is also the subject of profit and loss.

Moreover, Defendant C filed a counterclaim against the Plaintiff in the instant litigation procedure, on the premise that the Plaintiff was the party to the instant interior works, and did not assert that the Plaintiff’s contractual nature was the party to the instant interior works.

As to Defendant C’s agreement on the payment of KRW 50 million for the interior work, the Plaintiff agreed with Defendant C on KRW 20 million for the instant interior work. As the above exhibition hall cost increases considerably, the Plaintiff agreed on KRW 15 million, excluding KRW 5 million received from the Plaintiff, which Defendant C received from the Plaintiff, to waive all the remainder of KRW 15 million (i.e., to cover the increased exhibition hall cost). In addition, the Plaintiff agreed on the instant interior work under the direction of Defendant C with respect to the instant interior work, but the Plaintiff agreed on the extension of the instant interior work under the direction of Defendant C, while bearing the said cost.

Accordingly, Defendant C.

arrow