logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2017.06.30 2017고정117
정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who operates a general restaurant.

The facts are as follows: (a) the complainant did not have committed an act such as having a male and a diving or throwing away on a private surface; and (b) the complainant had a friendship meeting with a person who became aware of in the Kakao Stockholm, even though the complainant did not have intended to have a friendship meeting with him by Kakao Stockholm; (c) while having a friendship meeting with him, the complainant, who used the conversation called “C” in the Kakao Stockholm, appears to have the attitude of disregarding himself; (d) and (e) had a false fact posted on the Internet site to impair the reputation of the complainant.

On September 22, 2016, around 23:00, the Defendant “F” on the page “F”, a Internet SNS website, at his/her own residence located in Yansan-si E;

There is no desire for the lower court to take a bath, and there is a desire for the South Korean medicine, and that female male vagabonds, and that female spawn, and that the spathn of the spathn, shall be discarded down to the lower court.

The undisclosedenenenens C.

80 10 20 10 10

Many minutes also desire to see the name of the early C special male tag and to be inside the Maternity.

쇠鹬도요

In addition to the text of “Cpropy”, the complainant was registered as Kakao Stockholm under the name of “Cpropy”, and the complainant was registered as Kakao Stockholm under the name of the said conversation when the complainant “I am am and I am on the same day as in the past.”

B. It made a Kakao Stockholm, which was fabricated through an instigious display, with a view to harming the complainant, on the other hand, made a conversation “I do so,” or damaged the honor of the complainant by disclosing a false fact openly through an information and communications network, with the aim of slandering the complainant.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The defendant;

arrow