logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2014.05.02 2014고합86
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(절도)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 21, 2003, the defendant was sentenced to 11 months of imprisonment with prison labor due to night intrusion and larceny at night at the Seoul District Court, and the facts charged are stated that the defendant was sentenced to one year and four months of imprisonment with prison labor due to night intrusion and larceny at night at the Seoul District Court’s Branch Branch on September 3, 2003. However, according to the inquiry report, such as criminal records, etc., it is recognized that the above judgment was reversed on October 21, 2003 at the Seoul District Court, which is the appellate court, and that the defendant was sentenced to 11 months of imprisonment with prison labor. Since there is no concern that the defendant might have any substantial disadvantage

On July 23, 2004, the Gwangju District Court was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for an attempted larceny at night, and on May 12, 2005, the same court was sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, and on February 1, 2007, sentenced to two years of imprisonment for the same crime at the Seoul Southern District Court. On July 16, 2009, the Seoul Southern District Court was sentenced to two years of imprisonment for the same crime and completed the execution of the sentence on February 11, 2014.

On March 2, 2014, the Defendant opened a door that was owned by C, the victim C, at the resident priority parking lot located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Samsung-gu, Seoul Samsung-ro, and did not commit an attempted crime because there was no stolen objects.

From that time until March 11, 2014, the Defendant stated in the indictment totaling KRW 10,005,000, totaled of 10,000, which is the victims’ possession, on three occasions, as shown in the attached list of crimes, from that time until March 11, 2014. However, in light of the list of crimes, this appears to be a clear clerical error of KRW 10,005,00, which appears to be a clear clerical error in the list of crimes. Since there is no concern that the Defendant might have a substantial disadvantage

A considerable amount of property was stolen and attempted to steals property twice.

arrow