Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, from the date of the final judgment of this case, each of the above two years against the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants decided to accept the same set from the injured party despite the absence of the capacity to accept the set operated by the KCAC.

The money was raised to receive the money.

On April 17, 2017, at the Seoul branch office operated by the injured party in the F of the building in Gangdong-gu Seoul E Building, the Defendants concluded a final agreement with the injured party G to acquire D in the 97,000 square meters of the IB permanent domicile in the GG G G site as the representative of the H of the GH to acquire D in the 97,000 square meters of the IB permanent domicile in the G.

It is expected that Defendant B will be appointed as the representative director by taking over the set within several days, and the additional construction work will be carried out for three months, and it will be opened in July 2017.

It is expected that only 200 workers for Liart Services are expected to be paid, and if it is lent 30 million won as security deposit for cleaning and facility service right, it will be repaid later and the service contract will be concluded preferentially with the victim's operating company.

“The phrase “ was false.”

However, in fact, the LAC did not have any idea to sell the LAC, and the Defendants did not prepare the above LAC's acquisition price, and there was no discussion about the LAC's representative and the LAC's acquisition, so they did not have any intent or ability to acquire the above LAC's specific LAC at the time of receiving the money from the injured party.

On the same day, the Defendants received from the injured party the money of KRW 30 million from the J Association (K) account in the name of Defendant B.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to deception the victim by deceiving the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects by the prosecution against the Defendants (including the G substitute part)

1. Statement by the police concerning L;

1. A service agreement, a loan certificate, and a statement of deposit;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports ( telephone investigation-Reference L, M telephone communications, C Chairperson N telephone communications);

1. Relevant Articles 347(1) and 347(1)30 of the Criminal Act and the Defendants’ choice of punishment regarding criminal facts

1. Defendants on probation: Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act

1. Order of community service;